Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1630 v3 outperforms Ryzen 5 2400G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1630 v3 is 1253 days older than Ryzen 5 2400G.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3
- Performs up to 11% better in League of Legends than Ryzen 5 2400G - 132 vs 119 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E5-1630 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Ryzen 5 2400G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
