Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms Xeon E5-1630 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 2055 days newer than Xeon E5-1630 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 2% better in World of Tanks than Xeon E5-1630 v3 - 536 vs 524 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 - 65 vs 140 Watts
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1630 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Ryzen 3 3100
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
