Buy on Amazon
£91
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2700K outperforms Xeon E5-1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-2700K is 134 days older than Xeon E5-1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Performs up to 0% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Xeon E5-1620 - 212 vs 211 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 95 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-2700K
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
FPS
212
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.43/FPS
100%
Price, £
£91
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7-2700K 3.5 GHz Quad Core Processor (Socket 1155, 8MB L3 Cache, HyperThreading Technology, Retail)
Buy for £91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E5-1620
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i7-2700K
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 | vs | Intel Core i7-2700K |
|---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2011 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
