Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4590 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4590 is 786 days newer than Xeon E5-1620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4590 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4590
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-1620 - 118 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 84 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E5-1620
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i5-4590
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 | vs | Intel Core i5-4590 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 84 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
