Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6850K outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6850K is 20 days older than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i7-6850K - £49.95 vs £168.88
- Up to 68% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Core i7-6850K - £0.36 vs £1.12 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6850K
- Performs up to 9% better in FIFA 23 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 151 vs 138 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
138
91%
Value, £/FPS
£0.36/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
151
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.12/FPS
32%
Price, £
£168.88
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for £168.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i7-6850K |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Broadwell E |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |