Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v2 outperforms Pentium G645T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v2 is 373 days newer than Pentium G645T.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
- Performs up to 5% better in Sea of Thieves than Pentium G645T - 211 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G645T - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645T
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Xeon E5-1620 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Pentium G645T
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | Intel Pentium G645T |
|---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2012 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Pentium |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
