Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4430S outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4430S is 100 days older than Xeon E5-1620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4430S - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4430S
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield 1 than Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 236 vs 232 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-4430S |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |