Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700K outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700K is 1865 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700K
- Performs up to 10% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 124 vs 113 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 95 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E5-1620 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Core i7-9700K
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700K |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
