Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-14400 is 3772 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400
- Performs up to 89% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 140 vs 74 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
140
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.53/FPS
100%
Price, £
£213.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £213.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-14400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |