Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 2613 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 8% better in Dead Space than Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 158 vs 146 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 105 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 24 vs 8 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £197 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65580 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Single-Core
644
29.55484167049105%
Multi-Core
2356
19.82664310359337%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |