Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2400G outperforms Xeon E5-1607 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2400G is 1616 days newer than Xeon E5-1607 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Performs up to 9% better in Sea of Thieves than Xeon E5-1607 v2 - 224 vs 206 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Xeon E5-1607 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Ryzen 5 2400G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
