Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1545M v5 outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1545M v5 is 1565 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1545M v5
- Performs up to 5% better in Deathloop than FX-6100 - 176 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1545M v5
Server/Workstation • Jan 24th, 2016
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1545M v5 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 24th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | FX |
| Skylake | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
