Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1285L v4 outperforms Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1285L v4 is 679 days older than Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4
- Performs up to 3% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 5 1600 - 129 vs 125 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
125
96%
Value, £/FPS
£1.76/FPS
100%
Price, £
£220.6
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £220.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18315 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Broadwell | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel Iris Pro P6300 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |