Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms Xeon E3-1285L v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 1788 days newer than Xeon E3-1285L v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 2% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 122 vs 120 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E3-1285L v4
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2015
Ryzen 3 3100
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel Iris Pro P6300 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
