Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1285L v4 outperforms FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1285L v4 is 721 days newer than FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4
- Performs up to 11% better in Ready or Not than FX-9590 - 263 vs 237 FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 65 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E3-1285L v4
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2015
FX-9590
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | FX |
| Broadwell | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 220 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
Intel Iris Pro P6300 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
