Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1280 v5 outperforms Core i5-4670K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1280 v5 is 869 days newer than Core i5-4670K.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5
- Performs up to 1% better in Deathloop than Core i5-4670K - 177 vs 176 FPS
- Consumes up to 5% less energy than Intel Core i5-4670K - 80 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670K - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
176
99%
Value, £/FPS
£0.4/FPS
100%
Price, £
£71.18
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £71.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 221 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 | vs | Intel Core i5-4670K |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |