Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms Xeon E3-1280 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 2524 days newer than Xeon E3-1280 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 82 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 3% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 161 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
161
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.46/FPS
100%
Price, £
£235
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £235 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700K |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
82 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |