Buy on Amazon
£339.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-11700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-11700F is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Up to 3% cheaper than Core i7-11700F - £339.99 vs £350.0
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 4% better in Hogwarts Legacy than Core i7-10700K - 93 vs 89 FPS
- Up to 2% better value when playing Hogwarts Legacy than Core i7-10700K - £3.76 vs £3.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Hogwarts Legacy
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-10700K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
89
95.6989247311828%
Value, £/FPS
£3.82/FPS
98.42931937172776%
Price, £
£339.99
100%
Intel® Core™ i7-10700K Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.1 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 125WG13
Buy for £339.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1643 minutes ago
Core i7-11700F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
93
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.76/FPS
100%
Price, £
£350
97%
FPS and Value Winner
CORE I7-11700F 2.50GHZ CHIP
Buy for £350 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1642 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-10700K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Core i7-11700F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-10700K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1706
81.1994288434079%
Multi-Core
8142
92.62798634812287%
Intel Core i7-10700K | vs | Intel Core i7-11700F |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 16 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
