Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Xeon E3-1275 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 3895 days newer than Xeon E3-1275 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 77 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 18% better in Death Stranding than Xeon E3-1275 v2 - 253 vs 215 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2 - 32 vs 8 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
253
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.53/FPS
100%
Price, £
£640.28
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £640.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14612 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 150 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD P4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |