Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms Xeon E3-1275 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 2714 days newer than Xeon E3-1275 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 77 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Xeon E3-1275 v2 - 191 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2 - 24 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £764.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66730 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Single-Core
638
38.089552238805965%
Multi-Core
2254
19.860780685522954%
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-10920X |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 165 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD P4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |