Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Xeon E3-1275 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 1793 days newer than Xeon E3-1275 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 7% better in Far Cry 3 than Xeon E3-1275 v2 - 133 vs 124 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2 - 12 vs 8 threads
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
133
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.26/FPS
100%
Price, £
£300
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £300 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11040 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD P4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |