Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600K outperforms Xeon E3-1270 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12600K is 3077 days newer than Xeon E3-1270 v3.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1270 v3
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600K - 80 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 12% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E3-1270 v3 - 133 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
133
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.79/FPS
100%
Price, £
£238.61
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £238.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 341 minutes ago
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1270 v3 | vs | Core i5-12600K |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |