Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600X is 2226 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600X - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Performs up to 24% better in The Callisto Protocol than Xeon E3-1265L v3 - 128 vs 103 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 - 12 vs 8 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1265L v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Ryzen 5 3600X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
