Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms Xeon E5-2630 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600X is 1763 days newer than Xeon E5-2630 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Performs up to 8% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 135 vs 125 FPS
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600X - 85 vs 95 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 5 3600X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Xeon E5-2630 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Matisse | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 85 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
