Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2430 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 3% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 217 vs 211 FPS
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
217
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.59/FPS
100%
Price, £
£127.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £127.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |