Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms Xeon E3-1245 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 3017 days newer than Xeon E3-1245.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 8% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E3-1245 - 126 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1245 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
126
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.65/FPS
100%
Price, £
£81.34
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £81.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18689 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1245 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD P3000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |