Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1245 v5 outperforms Ryzen 5 1600X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1245 v5 is 540 days older than Ryzen 5 1600X.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1245 v5
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 5 1600X - 203 vs 200 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 80 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1245 v5 - 12 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
200
98%
Value, £/FPS
£0.89/FPS
100%
Price, £
£178.58
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £178.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1245 v5 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Skylake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
HD Graphics P530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |