Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 3228 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2
- Consumes up to 45% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 69 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 28% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 161 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 16 vs 8 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
161
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.36/FPS
100%
Price, £
£218.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £218.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5516 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900KF |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
69 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |