Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 4256 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 45% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 680 vs 468 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 16 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1240 v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Core i5-14400F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 69 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
