Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is 2520 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
- Performs up to 5% better in Minecraft than Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 654 vs 622 FPS
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 15 vs 69 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E3-1240 v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 69 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
