Buy on Amazon
£564.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 2714 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 69 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 5% better in Battlefield 1 than Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 244 vs 232 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 20 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
244
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.32/FPS
100%
Price, £
£564.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
CPU Intel Core i9-10900X 2066 Cascade BX
Buy for £564.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 130 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1240 v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Core i9-10900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Cascade Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
69 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
