Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2908 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 37% better in War Thunder than Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 192 vs 140 FPS
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 65 vs 69 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 16 vs 8 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
192
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.14/FPS
100%
Price, £
£218.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £218.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11145 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
69 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |