Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10300 outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10300 is 2908 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 17% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 110 vs 94 FPS
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 65 vs 69 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
110
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.55/FPS
100%
Price, £
£170.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £170.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-10300 |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
69 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |