Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms Xeon E3-1230 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 3315 days newer than Xeon E3-1230.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1230
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 80 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 14% better in Remnant II than Xeon E3-1230 - 91 vs 80 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1230 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1230 doesn't have integrated graphics
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
91
100%
Value, £/FPS
£4.93/FPS
100%
Price, £
£449
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £449 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1230 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |