Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Xeon E3-1225 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 2200 days newer than Xeon E3-1225.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1225
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 8% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E3-1225 - 166 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1225 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1225 - 12 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1225 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD P3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |