Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms Xeon E3-1225 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2844 days newer than Xeon E3-1225 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 84 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 14% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Xeon E3-1225 v3 - 273 vs 240 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 - 12 vs 4 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
273
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.7/FPS
100%
Price, £
£189.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £189.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12086 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD P4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |