Buy on Amazon
£677.57
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms Xeon E3-1220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 3315 days newer than Xeon E3-1220.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 15% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E3-1220 - 193 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1220 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1220 - 20 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1220 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i9-10900
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
193
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.51/FPS
100%
Price, £
£677.57
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-10900 (base clock: 2.80GHz; socket: LGA1200; 65 Watt) box BX8070110900
Buy for £677.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon E3-1220
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Core i9-10900
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
