Buy on Amazon
£839.38
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 194 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 1% better in F1 23 than Core i9-10920X - 242 vs 240 FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 65 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - £764.99 vs £839.38
- Up to 8% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i9-10900 - £3.19 vs £3.47 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900 - 24 vs 20 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i9-10900
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
242
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.47/FPS
91%
Price, £
£839.38
91%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10900 (base clock: 2.80GHz; socket: LGA1200; 65 Watt) box BX8070110900
Buy for £839.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15912 minutes ago
Core i9-10920X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
240
99%
Value, £/FPS
£3.19/FPS
100%
Price, £
£764.99
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i9-10920X Desktop Processor 12 Cores up to 4.8GHz Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 165W
Buy for £764.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15912 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i9-10900
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Core i9-10920X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | Intel Core i9-10920X |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Cascade Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 10 | Cores | 12 |
| 20 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
