Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1220 outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1220 is 192 days older than FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1220
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield IV than FX-6100 - 373 vs 367 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 80 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1220 - 6 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1220
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | FX |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
