Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2314 outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2314 is 2557 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2314
- Performs up to 19% better in Far Cry 3 than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 152 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2314 - 20 vs 4 threads
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2314 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Xeon E | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |