Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G7400 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium Gold G7400 is 294 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G7400
- Performs up to 5% better in Deathloop than Core i3-10105F - 187 vs 178 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 23% cheaper than Pentium Gold G7400 - £69.22 vs £89.99
- Up to 19% better value when playing Deathloop than Pentium Gold G7400 - £0.39 vs £0.48 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G7400 - 8 vs 4 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
187
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.48/FPS
81%
Price, £
£89.99
76%
FPS Winner
Buy for £89.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
178
95%
Value, £/FPS
£0.39/FPS
100%
Price, £
£69.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £69.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium Gold G7400 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Pentium Gold | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |