Key Differences
In short — Pentium G860 outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G860 is 1948 days older than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Pentium G860 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
211
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.14/FPS
100%
Price, £
£29.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £29.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G860 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |