Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms Pentium G645T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1584 days newer than Pentium G645T.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3930 - 35 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 1% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Pentium G645T - 110 vs 109 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75729 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Single-Core
355
58.38815789473685%
Multi-Core
606
58.101629913710454%
Intel Pentium G645T | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |