Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1840 outperforms Pentium G645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1840 is 606 days newer than Pentium G645.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Performs up to 2% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Pentium G645 - 242 vs 237 FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Pentium G645 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
242
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.21/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G645 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 53 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |