Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Pentium G645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 1761 days newer than Pentium G645.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 11% better in World of Warcraft than Pentium G645 - 172 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G645 - 64 vs 2 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Pentium G645
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G645 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2nd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Pentium | Collection | EPYC |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 32 |
| 2 | Threads | 64 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
