Key Differences
In short — Pentium G4400 outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G4400 is 1420 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Performs up to 2% better in Deathloop than FX-6100 - 170 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 6 vs 2 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
170
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.6/FPS
100%
Price, £
£101.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £101.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4895 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G4400 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Pentium | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |