Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3250T outperforms FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3250T is 1013 days newer than FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250T
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than FX-8150 - 145 vs 144 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3250T - 8 vs 2 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G3250T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FX-8150
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3250T | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Pentium | Collection | FX |
| Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
