Key Differences
In short — FX-6350 outperforms Pentium 2020M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6350 is 240 days newer than Pentium 2020M.
Advantages of Intel Pentium 2020M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than Pentium 2020M - 111 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium 2020M - 6 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
111
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.45/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 137 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium 2020M | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Pentium | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |