Buy on Amazon
£49.95
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $294
Availability
MSRP in USD: $294
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms Core M-5Y10c on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 602 days newer than Core M-5Y10c.
Advantages of Intel Core M-5Y10c
- Consumes up to 97% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 4 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 3% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core M-5Y10c - 132 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core M-5Y10c - 8 vs 4 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
132
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.38/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Corp. BX80660E51620V4 Xeon Processor E5-1620 v4
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core M-5Y10c
Mobile • Oct 27th, 2014
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core M-5Y10c | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 27th, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
| Core M | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
| Intel BGA 1234 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 0.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 8.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 5300 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
