Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms Core M-5Y10c on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 2332 days newer than Core M-5Y10c.
Advantages of Intel Core M-5Y10c
- Consumes up to 97% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 4 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 52% better in Dirt 5 than Core M-5Y10c - 220 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core M-5Y10c - 12 vs 4 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
220
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.82/FPS
100%
Price, £
£179.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £179.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15625 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Oct 27th, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core M-5Y10c | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 27th, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core M | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel BGA 1234 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
0.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
4 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
8.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 5300 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |